Syafarudin Syafarudin, Darmawan Purba


in the present day (2) to examine the outdated assumption that the ethnic of lampung is likely more
patriarchy or matriarchal cultural and political affairs; (3) to analysis and find answer related to the
cultural change occurred. Researc location is in Lampung Province, from 20-27 october 2016. This
research applied the descriptive and mixed methods. Survey was conducted by face to face interview
and it was choosen by using purposive sampling methods and snowbowling technique. In addition, the
respondent are male and female with boat in equalnumber of respondent, age between 17 and 30, come
from lampungese family (either father or mother should be lampungese), educating in social or natural science background and responden should lived in lampung province. According to chose criteria we
have therefore 120 respondents.The research concluded that the youth of lampungese tend to be more
politically independent not a patriarchy or matriarchal, even there is difference in voting but still having
a tolerant, participative and having a symptom toward a more cosmopolitan democracy. There are
several reason behind this changing: (1) the wave of liberal democracy with one man one vote system
therefore it also imply on the free of expressing the opinion/argument by the youth of lampungese
(2) the impact of technology of information; (3) better welfare level of lampungese; (4) the impact of
democratic and massive member recruitmen by political party and finally, it occurred due to influence of
television such as the tv show/ reality with portraying how to be a more independent person.
Keywords: political culture of Lampung Ethnic Youth


Almond, and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic

Culture. Princeton University Press.


Amran, Frieda.2016. Mencari Jejak Masa Lalu

Lampung. Pustaka Labrak. Bandar Lampung.

Anderson, ROG, Benedict.1990. Languange

and Power, Exploring Politichal Culture in

Indonesia. Cornell university press itacha,

New York.

Brannen, Julia. 1997. Memadu Metode Penelitian

kuantitatif dan Kualitatif “, Pustaka Pelajar,


Bubant, Nils. 2014. Democracy, Corruption

and the Politics of Spirits in Contemporary

Indonesia”, Roudledge Avanue, New York

Bungin, Burhan. 2001. Metodologi penelitian

Sosial: Format Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif.

Airlangga University Press. Surabaya.

Djausal, Anshori. 1999. Perjalanan Setitik Air:

menjejak waktu, melangkahi bayang, menuju

matahari. Penerbit Bumilada. Lampung


Gaffar, Afan. 1992. Javanase Voters:A case study

of elections under a hegemonic party system.

Gadjah mada university press. Yogyakarta.

Geertz, Clifford. 1960. The Religion of Java. The

Free press. Glenco Illionis.

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. Interpretation of Cultures.

Basic book, New York.

Held, David. 1996. Democracy and the

Global Order: From the Modern State to

Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford, CA:

Stanford University Press.

Karzi, Z, Udo Z. 2016. Fedodalisme Modern:

Wacana Kritis tentang Lampung dan

kelampungan. Sai Wawai Publishing. Bandar


Kepemimpinan Pemerintahan Provinsi Lampung

Periode 1945-1964. Jurnal Fiat Justisia FH

Unila No.3.

Kleden, Ignas. 1987. Sikap Ilmiah dan Kritik

Kebudayaan”, PenerbitLP3ES, Jakarta.

M, Hubert and Jr, Blalock. 2001. Bassic

Dilemmas in The Social Science. Sage

Publications, London.

Nordholt, Schulte, Henk dan Klinken, van, Gerry

(editor). 2007. Renegotiating boundaries:

local politics post Suharto Indonesia,

KITLV, Leiden Belanda.

Usman, Sunyoto. 2004. Jalan Terjal Perubahan

Sosial. Cired. Yogyakarta.

Warganegara, Arizka. 2013.

Warganegara, Arizka. Budaya Politik Lampung.

Lampung Post. 18 Maret 2014

Full Text: PDF